Layer 2 Networks

6 Best Layer 2 Blockchains in 2026

Six Ethereum rollups ranked on how fees are built, how long withdrawals to Ethereum take and who runs the sequencer. Checked Sep 26, 2026.

6 picks · 5 criteria · every fee linked to its source
Jump to comparison ↓
On this page

Base is the easiest Ethereum layer 2 for most users: it is built by Coinbase, needs no separate token for gas, and its code is public under MIT. The trade-off shared by optimistic rollups is time: withdrawals from Base, Arbitrum and OP Mainnet to Ethereum wait about 7 days. ZK rollups cut that, to about 3 hours on ZKsync and a median of about 2 hours on Linea.

Quick answer

Use Base for everyday apps and Coinbase on-ramps, Arbitrum for DeFi, and a ZK rollup such as ZKsync or Linea if you need to move funds back to Ethereum in hours rather than 7 days.

  1. 01Base: best for most users
  2. 02Arbitrum: best for DeFi
  3. 03OP Mainnet: best for OP Stack apps
  4. 04ZKsync: best for fast exits
  5. 05Linea: Best ZK rollup for EVM

The 6 best layer 2 networks

#1

Base

Best for most users

Base is built by Coinbase, uses ETH for gas with no separate token, and publishes its node software under MIT. Each transaction pays an L2 execution fee plus an L1 security fee.

Chains
Ethereum L2
Platforms
Web, API
Fees
L2 execution fee plus L1 security fee
Company
Built by Coinbase
Open source
Yes, MIT license (github.com/base/base)
Pros
  • Swaps and sends inside Base do not wait for the 7-day withdrawal window
  • Node software published under the MIT license on GitHub
  • No separate network token needed to pay gas
Cons
  • Withdrawals to Ethereum take 7 days to finalize
  • L1 security fee is typically higher than the L2 execution fee
  • Built by a single company, Coinbase

Skip it if you often withdraw to Ethereum: exits wait 7 days.

#2

Arbitrum

Best for DeFi

Arbitrum One runs Offchain Labs' open-source Nitro software and lets users force inclusion if the sequencer stalls. Its challenge period is 45,818 blocks, about 6.4 days.

Chains
Ethereum L2
Platforms
Web, API
Fees
L2 network fee plus parent chain (L1) data poster fee
Token
ARB (governance)
Company
Offchain Labs (Nitro implementation)
Pros
  • BoLD dispute protocol resolves challenges within a fixed period
  • Nitro node code is public on GitHub
  • Censorship timeout lets users force inclusion if the Sequencer stalls
Cons
  • Withdrawals to Ethereum take about 7 days
  • Sequencer is still centralized per Arbitrum docs, with decentralization a long-term goal
  • Withdrawal claims must be executed manually on Ethereum

Skip it if you want a decentralized sequencer today: Arbitrum's docs call that a long-term goal.

#3

OP Mainnet

Best for OP Stack apps

OP Mainnet is the reference OP Stack chain, with code under MIT. Transactions finalize on Ethereum in about 15 to 30 minutes, and users can force inclusion from L1 if the sequencer is down.

Chains
Ethereum L2
Platforms
Web, API
Fees
Execution gas fee plus L1 data fee plus operator fee (after Isthmus)
Open source
Yes, MIT license (github.com/ethereum-optimism/optimism)
Pros
  • Transactions finalize on Ethereum in about 15 to 30 minutes
  • OP Stack code is public under the MIT license
  • Forced inclusion from L1 if the Sequencer goes down
Cons
  • Standard Bridge withdrawals are delayed 7 days
  • Soft finality relies on a single Sequencer run by the chain operator
  • Extra operator fee component after the Isthmus upgrade

Skip it if you use the Standard Bridge to exit: withdrawals wait 7 days.

#4

ZKsync

Best for fast exits

ZKsync proves every batch with zero-knowledge proofs, and its execution delay was cut from 21 hours to at least 3 hours, so full finality is about 3 hours. Node code is public under Apache-2.0.

Chains
Ethereum L2
Platforms
Web, API
Fees
L2 fee that includes L1 pubdata cost, varies with L1 gas prices
Open source
Yes, Apache-2.0 (github.com/matter-labs/zksync-era)
Pros
  • Full finality in about 3 hours, not 7 days
  • Execution delay gives time to freeze the protocol if a bug is exploited
  • Node code public under Apache-2.0
Cons
  • Opcode pricing differs from Ethereum, e.g. keccak256 costs more
  • L2 fees move with volatile L1 gas prices
  • Validator role is controlled by the team behind a time lock

Skip it if you port gas-tuned Ethereum contracts: some opcodes, such as keccak256, cost more.

#5

Linea

Best ZK rollup for EVM

Linea is a zkEVM incubated within Consensys. Gas is paid in ETH, soft finality takes about 1 second and median hard finality about 2 hours. Its monorepo is public under Apache-2.0.

Chains
Ethereum L2
Platforms
Web, API
Company
Incubated within Consensys
Token
LINEA (no governance rights; gas paid in ETH)
Fees
Gas used times (base fee plus priority fee), paid in ETH
Pros
  • Median hard finality about 2 hours, no 7-day fraud proof lockup
  • Gas paid in ETH, no token needed to use the network
  • Monorepo public under Apache-2.0
Cons
  • LINEA token has no governance rights
  • Hard finality can take up to 16 hours under normal conditions
  • Planned cut of hard finality to under 30 minutes is not live yet

Skip it if you want governance rights: the LINEA token has none.

#6

Starknet

Best for Cairo builders

Starknet settles batches with STARK proofs, so there is no fraud proof window. Since v0.14.0 on September 1, 2025, fees are paid only in STRK.

Chains
Ethereum L2
Platforms
Web, API
Token
STRK (fees, staking, governance)
Fees
L2 computation, L2 data and L1 data; paid only in STRK since v0.14.0
Open source
Yes, Apache-2.0 (github.com/starkware-libs/sequencer)
Pros
  • Validity proofs, no fraud proof window
  • STRK also used for staking and governance
  • Sequencer code public under Apache-2.0
Cons
  • Fees only payable in STRK since v0.14.0, not ETH
  • Not EVM, contracts use Cairo
  • Part of STRK fees may be converted to ETH by the sequencer to cover L1 gas

Skip it if you want to deploy Solidity: Starknet contracts use Cairo.

Not on this list

Polygon: Polygon PoS is a proof-of-stake chain anchored to Ethereum, not a rollup, so we cover it separately.

scroll: scroll.io now presents an AI product; we could not confirm the chain from its main site.

Layer 2 Networks compared

Select a name to jump to its review.
NameBest forFeesChainsToken
BaseEveryday apps, no gas tokenL2 execution fee plus L1 security feeEthereum L2Not verified
ArbitrumDeFi on an optimistic rollupL2 network fee plus parent chain (L1) data poster feeEthereum L2ARB (governance)
OP MainnetOP Stack ecosystemExecution gas fee plus L1 data fee plus operator fee (after Isthmus)Ethereum L2Not verified
ZKsyncExits in about 3 hoursL2 fee that includes L1 pubdata cost, varies with L1 gas pricesEthereum L2Not verified
LineazkEVM, gas paid in ETHGas used times (base fee plus priority fee), paid in ETHEthereum L2LINEA (no governance rights; gas paid in ETH)
StarknetSTARK proofs, CairoL2 computation, L2 data and L1 data; paid only in STRK since v0.14.0Ethereum L2STRK (fees, staking, governance)

“Not verified” means we could not confirm the value on the project’s own pages.

How we rank layer 2 networks

  1. 01Rollup type: optimistic or ZK, which decides how long withdrawals to Ethereum take.
  2. 02Fee model: how the network's own docs split the fee between L2 execution and L1 data.
  3. 03Withdrawal time: time to finalize an exit to Ethereum, from the network's docs.
  4. 04Sequencer and escape hatch: who orders transactions and whether users can force inclusion from Ethereum.
  5. 05Open source: whether node code is public on GitHub.

No project paid to be listed or ranked. Full rules: methodology.

How to choose

Optimistic vs ZK

Base, Arbitrum and OP Mainnet assume transactions are valid and allow a challenge window, so exits take about 7 days. ZKsync, Linea and Starknet post proofs, so exits take hours.

Use a bridge to skip the wait

Third-party bridges such as Across move funds out of an L2 in minutes for a fee, instead of waiting out the 7-day window. See our bridges list.

Check the gas token

Base, Arbitrum, OP Mainnet and Linea use ETH for gas. Starknet requires STRK since September 1, 2025.

Who should skip all of these

  • Anyone picking a token to invest in: this list compares networks, and Base has no token at all.
  • Solana or Bitcoin users: these are Ethereum rollups.

Which one fits you?

Bottom line

Base and Arbitrum cover most users; choose a ZK rollup when exit time to Ethereum matters.

Before moving large amounts, read how each network handles a stalled sequencer: Arbitrum and OP Mainnet let users force inclusion from Ethereum.

Educational content, not financial advice. Crypto assets are volatile; do your own research.

FAQ

What is a layer 2 blockchain?

A network that runs transactions off Ethereum and posts data or proofs back to it. Rollups like Base and ZKsync inherit settlement from Ethereum.

Why do withdrawals from Arbitrum or Base take 7 days?

They are optimistic rollups: withdrawals wait out a challenge period so invalid state can be disputed. Arbitrum's is 45,818 blocks, about 6.4 days.

Which layer 2 is fastest to withdraw from?

Of those we checked, ZK rollups: Linea's median hard finality is about 2 hours and ZKsync's about 3 hours.

Does Base have a token?

No. Base uses ETH for gas and has no separate network token.

Sources

  1. Base: Network fees
  2. Base: Docs overview
  3. Base: GitHub repository
  4. Arbitrum: Gas and fees
  5. Arbitrum DAO: Conceptual overview
  6. Arbitrum: Understanding the risks
  7. Arbitrum: Nitro GitHub repository
  8. OP: Transaction fees on OP Mainnet
  9. OP: GitHub repository
  10. ZKsync: Fee model
  11. ZKsync: GitHub repository
  12. Linea: Linea Mainnet
  13. Linea: Tokenomics
  14. Linea: Estimate gas costs
  15. Linea: GitHub repository
  16. Starknet: STRK
  17. Starknet: Fees
  18. Starknet: Sequencer GitHub repository

What changed in this list

2026-09-26First version: six Ethereum layer 2 networks ranked on rollup type, fees, withdrawal time and open code.

How this page works

Sources: Base: Network fees, Base: Docs overview, Base: GitHub repository. Data as of Sep 26, 2026.

How we review

Not affiliated with any project listed. Educational content, not financial advice.