MetaMask vs Rabby: Which Wallet Is Better in 2026?
Self-custody, chains, swap fees and security, side by side. Fees are checked against each wallet’s own documentation.
Draft: this comparison is being reviewed by our editors before publication.
In this comparison
Rabby is the better pick for active DeFi users on EVM networks: it charges 0.25% on in-app swaps against MetaMask’s 0.875% and runs risk checks before every signature.
MetaMask is still the safer default if you need Solana accounts or want the wallet that dApps test against first. Both are self-custody, both are free to install, and both import the same seed phrase.
Quick verdict: MetaMask or Rabby?
Rabby for DeFi on EVM; MetaMask for the widest dApp compatibility and Solana.
Users who want the most widely supported wallet and Solana accounts next to EVM.
DeFi users who swap often on EVM networks and want checks before signing.
- Solana accounts in the same wallet
- The wallet most dApps list first
- A long track record
- A lower in-app swap fee
- Automatic network switching per dApp
- Risk checks on every signature
Other MetaMask alternatives to compare
Self-custody wallet from Coinbase, separate from the Coinbase exchange account.
MetaMask vs Coinbase Wallet →Multichain wallet that started on Solana and now covers Ethereum, Base, Polygon, Sui and Bitcoin.
MetaMask vs Phantom →MetaMask vs Rabby at a glance
| Category | MetaMask | Rabby |
|---|---|---|
| Custody | Self-custody | Self-custody |
| Chains | EVM networks, Solana | EVM networks |
| Platforms | Extension, iOS, Android | Extension, iOS, Android, Desktop |
| Swap fee ⓘThe wallet’s own fee on in-app swaps, excluding network gas. | 0.875% | 0.25% |
| US availability ⓘListed in the US App Store. | Yes | Yes |
| Main security feature | Open source, phishing detection | Transaction simulation |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Data as of Sep 26, 2026. Sources: each wallet’s own fee pages and the US App Store. Fees change; check the quote in the app before you swap.
What are MetaMask and Rabby?
MetaMask
MetaMask is a self-custody wallet from Consensys, available as a browser extension and a mobile app. It is the wallet most EVM dApps test against first, and it added Solana accounts in 2025.
Rabby
Rabby is an EVM wallet from the team behind DeBank. It simulates each transaction and shows the balance change before you sign, and it switches to the network a dApp needs on its own.
Fees
Rabby is cheaper for in-app swaps.
MetaMask
Adds a 0.875% service fee to in-app swap quotes, on top of network gas.
Rabby
Charges 0.25% on in-app swaps, according to its official announcement.
Winner: Rabby
Chains
MetaMask covers more ground.
MetaMask
EVM networks plus Solana accounts, added in 2025.
Rabby
EVM networks only; no Solana or Bitcoin.
Winner: MetaMask
Security
Close, with different emphasis.
MetaMask
Open source, with balance-change previews and security alerts.
Rabby
Open source, simulates each transaction and flags risky approvals before you sign.
Tie
MetaMask or Rabby: final verdict
If you mainly use DeFi on Ethereum and L2s and swap inside the wallet, Rabby costs less per swap and handles network switching for you.
If you also hold Solana, or you want the wallet every dApp supports without question, MetaMask remains the default.
- Swap fee: Rabby
- Chain coverage: MetaMask
- dApp compatibility: MetaMask
- Signing safety: Tie
Educational content, not financial advice. Crypto assets are volatile; only sign transactions you understand.
How we compared MetaMask and Rabby
We compared both wallets on the same criteria as our MetaMask alternatives list: supported chains, custody, the wallet’s own swap fee, security features, US App Store availability and platforms. Fees come from each wallet’s own fee page or official announcement and carry the date we checked them.
MetaMask vs Rabby: FAQ
Is Rabby safer than MetaMask?
Both are self-custody and open source. Rabby adds its own risk checks on each signature; MetaMask shows balance-change previews and security alerts. Safety depends most on how you store your seed phrase.
Can I import my MetaMask wallet into Rabby?
Yes. Rabby imports a standard seed phrase or private key, so the same addresses appear in both wallets.
Does Rabby support Solana?
No. Rabby works with EVM networks only. For Solana, use MetaMask’s Solana accounts or a Solana-first wallet such as Phantom.
What a swap costs in MetaMask vs Rabby
The wallet’s own fee on an in-app swap, before network gas. Rates checked Sep 26, 2026.
| Swap size | MetaMask (0.875%) | Rabby (0.25%) |
|---|---|---|
| $100.00 | $0.88 | $0.25 |
| $1,000.00 | $8.75 | $2.50 |
| $10,000.00 | $87.50 | $25.00 |
Network gas and DEX or bridge fees come on top. Some pairs may carry a different rate; check the quote in the app.
MetaMask vs Rabby by user type
| If you are… | Pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Frequent DeFi trader on EVM | Rabby | Lower swap fee and automatic network switching. |
| Holds EVM tokens and Solana | MetaMask | Both chains in one wallet. |
| Beginner using one or two dApps | MetaMask | The wallet guides and dApps assume. |
| Mostly on Solana | Neither | Phantom is built for Solana first. |
Get alerts when MetaMask or Rabby changes fees
One email when either wallet changes its swap fee, drops a chain or has a security incident. No spam.
Only when fees or availability change. Unsubscribe anytime. We never share your email. Privacy Policy
Pros and cons
- Pro: Works with almost every EVM dApp
- Pro: Open-source code
- Pro: Extension and mobile app with one seed phrase
- Con: 0.875% fee on in-app swaps, higher than most wallets here
- Con: Solana support is newer than in Solana-first wallets
- Pro: Balance-change preview before every signature
- Pro: Automatic network switching
- Pro: Lower in-app swap fee (0.25%)
- Con: EVM networks only, no Solana or Bitcoin
- Con: Smaller user base, so fewer dApps name it in their docs
Sources
How this page works
Sources: MetaMask Support — Swaps user guide, Rabby on X — swap fee announcement. Data as of Sep 26, 2026.
Not affiliated with any project listed. Educational content, not financial advice.