P2P.org supports 40+ proof-of-stake networks and states seven years with zero slashing, while Figment reports 1,500+ institutional clients across 30+ protocols. These are validator operators for businesses. None of the six publishes a flat fee on the pages we checked, so ask each for its commission in writing.
Quick answer
Shortlist Figment or P2P.org for the widest network coverage with non-custodial staking. Add Kiln for white-label ETH staking, Everstake for its certification list, and Blockdaemon if you also need MPC custody and RPC from one vendor.
- 01Figment: Most institutional clients
- 02P2P.org: Most networks
- 03Kiln: White-label ETH
- 04Everstake: Longest cert list
- 05Chorus One: Part of Bitwise
The 6 best staking providers
#1F
Most institutional clients
Figment reports 1,500+ institutional clients across 30+ protocols, never takes custody of tokens, and offers slashing coverage and a staking data API.
- Platforms
- Web
- Chains
- 30+ protocols including Ethereum, Solana, Avalanche, Polkadot, NEAR
- Company
- Institutional staking provider; 1,500+ institutional clients
Pros
- Non-custodial: tokens stay under the client's own keys
- 1,500+ institutional clients, per its homepage
- Offers slashing coverage and a staking data API
Cons
- Aimed at institutions, not individual stakers
- No fee published on its homepage
Skip it if you are an individual; it is built for institutions.
P2P.org supports 40+ PoS networks, is SOC 2 Type II certified and states seven years with zero slashing. It also offers EigenLayer restaking and DVT staking.
- Platforms
- Web
- Chains
- 40+ PoS networks including Ethereum, Solana, Polkadot, Cosmos
- Company
- Non-custodial staking provider; SOC 2 Type II
Pros
- 40+ networks supported
- SOC 2 Type II certified, audited by KirkpatrickPrice
- States seven years with zero slashing
Cons
- Takes a commission on rewards; the rate is not on its homepage
- Built for businesses, not retail stakers
Skip it if you need the commission rate up front: it is not on its homepage.
Kiln, running since 2018, offers dedicated validators from 32 ETH, pooled staking below that, and SOC 2 Type II. It disclosed a validator exit infrastructure issue in September 2025.
- Platforms
- Web
- Launched
- 2018
- Company
- Offices in Paris, London and Singapore; SOC 2 certified
Pros
- SOC 2 Type II certified, renewed in 2026
- White-label ETH staking from 32 ETH, or pooled below it
- Offers slashing coverage, per its FAQ
Cons
- September 2025 validator exit issue, disclosed on its own site
- No flat fee published on its homepage
Skip it if a disclosed 2025 incident rules a vendor out for you.
Everstake, founded in 2018, lists SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001 and NIST CSF, and states 1.6M+ delegators.
- Platforms
- Web
- Launched
- 2018
- Company
- Certified SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001, NIST CSF
Pros
- 1.6M+ delegators, per its homepage
- SOC 2 Type II and ISO/IEC 27001 listed
- Serves individuals as well as institutions
Cons
- No flat fee published on the pages checked
- Reward rates shown are network rates, not guarantees
Skip it if you want a single enterprise platform for custody too.
Chorus One, active since 2018, supports 30+ networks and runs public nodes. It is now part of the asset manager Bitwise.
- Platforms
- Web
- Launched
- 2018
- Company
- Part of Bitwise
- Chains
- 30+ networks including Ethereum, Solana, Cosmos, NEAR
Pros
- Support for 30+ protocols
- Public nodes open to individual delegators
- Publishes staking research
Cons
- Ownership changed: now part of Bitwise
- No fee published on its homepage
Skip it if you prefer an independent operator.
Blockdaemon pairs staking APIs with a self-hosted MPC vault and RPC, cites ISO 27001, and says it has helped deploy $6+ billion of staking infrastructure.
- Platforms
- Web
- Company
- Institutional infrastructure; ISO 27001 certified
- Chains
- Includes Ethereum, Solana, Cardano, NEAR, Sui, TON, Stellar
Pros
- Staking, MPC custody and RPC from one vendor
- ISO 27001 certification, per its homepage
- On-premise deployment option
Cons
- No fee published
- Product range is wide, so staking is one line among many
Skip it if you only need staking; its product range is wide.
Not on this list
Coinbase Cloud: Not reviewed as a separate brand; we could not open Coinbase pages (403) to confirm its current staking offer.
Staking Providers compared
Select a name to jump to its review.
| Name | Best for | Chains |
|---|
| Figment | Asset managers, custodians | 30+ protocols including Ethereum, Solana, Avalanche, Polkadot, NEAR |
|---|
| P2P.org | Multi-chain treasuries | 40+ PoS networks including Ethereum, Solana, Polkadot, Cosmos |
|---|
| Kiln | Exchanges and wallets | Not verified |
|---|
| Everstake | Compliance-heavy buyers | Not verified |
|---|
| Chorus One | Research-led teams | 30+ networks including Ethereum, Solana, Cosmos, NEAR |
|---|
| Blockdaemon | One-vendor stacks | Includes Ethereum, Solana, Cardano, NEAR, Sui, TON, Stellar |
|---|
“Not verified” means we could not confirm the value on the project’s own pages.
How we rank staking providers
- 01Networks: how many proof-of-stake networks the provider says it supports.
- 02Custody model: whether assets stay under the client's keys.
- 03Certifications: SOC 2 and ISO certifications the provider lists.
- 04Track record: founding year and incidents the provider discloses itself.
- 05Fees: published commission, if any.
No project paid to be listed or ranked. Full rules: methodology.
How to choose
Ask for the commission in writing
None of the six posts a flat fee on the pages we checked. P2P.org says it takes a commission from rewards; get the rate per network.
Check the certification date
Kiln renewed SOC 2 Type II in 2026; ask any provider for its latest report, not just the badge.
Read the incident notices
Kiln published a notice on a September 2025 validator exit issue. A provider that discloses incidents on its own site is easier to vet.
Who should skip all of these
- Retail stakers looking for an app: use a liquid staking protocol or an exchange instead.
- Anyone who wants a guaranteed yield: rates shown are network reward rates and change.
Bottom line
Pick on networks and custody model first, then get the commission in writing: none of the six publishes it.
Figment and P2P.org cover the most networks; Kiln fits white-label ETH.
Educational content, not financial advice. Crypto assets are volatile; do your own research.
FAQ
What is an institutional staking provider?
±
A company that runs validator nodes for funds, custodians and exchanges, so they earn staking rewards without running infrastructure themselves.
Do these providers take custody?
±
Figment says it never takes custody, and P2P.org describes itself as non-custodial.
What fees do staking providers charge?
±
They take a commission on rewards. None of the six publishes a flat rate on the pages we checked.
Which staking provider supports the most networks?
±
P2P.org states 40+ networks; Figment and Chorus One state 30+.
What changed in this list
2026-09-26First version: 6 institutional staking providers, facts from each provider's own site.