P2P.org supports 40+ proof-of-stake networks and states seven years with zero slashing, while Figment reports 1,500+ institutional clients across 30+ protocols. These are validator operators for businesses. None of the five publishes a flat fee on the pages we checked, so ask each for its commission in writing.
Quick answer
Shortlist Figment or P2P.org for the widest network coverage with non-custodial staking. Add Everstake for its certification list, and Blockdaemon if you also need MPC custody and RPC from one vendor.
- 01Figment: Most institutional clients
- 02P2P.org: Most networks
- 03Everstake: Longest cert list
- 04Chorus One: Part of Bitwise
- 05Blockdaemon: Staking plus custody
The 5 best staking providers
#1F
Most institutional clients
Figment reports 1,500+ institutional clients across 30+ protocols, never takes custody of tokens, and offers slashing coverage and a staking data API.
- Platforms
- Web
- Chains
- 30+ protocols including Ethereum, Solana, Avalanche, Polkadot, NEAR
- Company
- Institutional staking provider; 1,500+ institutional clients
- Fees
- Service fee paid on-chain by each network, visible on block explorers; no public price list
- Security audits
- SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certified environment
Pros
- Non-custodial: tokens stay under the client's own keys
- 1,500+ institutional clients, per its homepage
- Offers slashing coverage and a staking data API
Cons
- Aimed at institutions, not individual stakers
- No fee published on its homepage
Skip it if you are an individual; it is built for institutions.
P2P.org supports 40+ PoS networks, is SOC 2 Type II certified and states seven years with zero slashing. It also offers EigenLayer restaking and DVT staking.
- Platforms
- Web
- Chains
- 40+ PoS networks including Ethereum, Solana, Polkadot, Cosmos
- Company
- Non-custodial staking provider; SOC 2 Type II
- Fees
- 5% of rewards on native ETH staking; 7% on DVT ETH staking
- Security audits
- Smart contracts audited by MixBytes; SOC 2 Type II by KirkpatrickPrice
Pros
- 40+ networks supported
- SOC 2 Type II certified, audited by KirkpatrickPrice
- States seven years with zero slashing
Cons
- 5% fee on native ETH staking rewards, 7% on DVT and Solana
- Direct ETH staking starts at 32 ETH; smaller amounts go to pools
Skip it if you need the commission rate up front: it is not on its homepage.
Everstake, founded in 2018, lists SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001 and NIST CSF, and states 1.6M+ delegators.
- Platforms
- Web
- Launched
- 2018
- Company
- Founded 2018 by Sergii Vasylchuk; about 100 team members, 75% engineers
- Pricing
- Validator-as-a-Service for Solana: Core $199/mo, Prime $499/mo, Infinity custom
- Security audits
- SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, NIST CSF
Pros
- 1.6M+ delegators, per its homepage
- SOC 2 Type II and ISO/IEC 27001 listed
- Serves individuals as well as institutions
Cons
- Delegator commission is not published; only Solana Validator-as-a-Service has public prices
- Reward rates shown are network rates, not guarantees
Skip it if you want a single enterprise platform for custody too.
Chorus One, active since 2018, supports 30+ networks and runs public nodes. It is now part of the asset manager Bitwise.
- Platforms
- Web
- Launched
- 2018
- Company
- Chorus One AG, doing business as Bitwise Onchain Solutions; acquired by Bitwise in February 2026
- Chains
- 30+ networks including Ethereum, Solana, Cosmos, NEAR
- Security audits
- ISO 27001 certified
Pros
- Support for 30+ protocols
- Public nodes open to individual delegators
- Publishes staking research
Cons
- Ownership changed: now part of Bitwise
- No fee published on its homepage
Skip it if you prefer an independent operator.
Blockdaemon pairs staking APIs with a self-hosted MPC vault and RPC, cites ISO 27001, and says it has helped deploy $6+ billion of staking infrastructure.
- Platforms
- Web
- Company
- Institutional infrastructure; ISO 27001 certified
- Chains
- Includes Ethereum, Solana, Cardano, NEAR, Sui, TON, Stellar
- Launched
- Blockdaemon Inc. established October 2017 in San Francisco
- Free plan
- Free API plan: 5 requests per second; free account signup
Pros
- Staking, MPC custody and RPC from one vendor
- ISO 27001 certification, per its homepage
- On-premise deployment option
Cons
- No fee published
- Product range is wide, so staking is one line among many
Skip it if you only need staking; its product range is wide.
Not on this list
Coinbase Cloud: Not reviewed as a separate brand; we could not open Coinbase pages (403) to confirm its current staking offer.
Kiln: Terms exclude US residents: Kiln's terms list the United States as a prohibited country.
Staking Providers compared
Select a name to jump to its review.
| Name | Best for | US availability | Chains | Security audits |
|---|
| Figment | Asset managers, custodians | Available: terms restrict only sanctioned jurisdictions | 30+ protocols including Ethereum, Solana, Avalanche, Polkadot, NEAR | SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certified environment |
|---|
| P2P.org | Multi-chain treasuries | Available: terms restrict only sanctioned jurisdictions | 40+ PoS networks including Ethereum, Solana, Polkadot, Cosmos | Smart contracts audited by MixBytes; SOC 2 Type II by KirkpatrickPrice |
|---|
| Everstake | Compliance-heavy buyers | Available: terms restrict only sanctioned jurisdictions | 130+ networks supported to date | SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, NIST CSF |
|---|
| Chorus One | Research-led teams | Available: terms restrict only sanctioned jurisdictions | 30+ networks including Ethereum, Solana, Cosmos, NEAR | ISO 27001 certified |
|---|
| Blockdaemon | One-vendor stacks | Available: terms restrict only sanctioned jurisdictions | Includes Ethereum, Solana, Cardano, NEAR, Sui, TON, Stellar | SOC 2 Type II (June 2025), ISO 27001 (July 2022) |
|---|
“Not verified” means we could not confirm the value on the project’s own pages.
How we rank staking providers
- 01Networks: how many proof-of-stake networks the provider says it supports.
- 02Custody model: whether assets stay under the client's keys.
- 03Certifications: SOC 2 and ISO certifications the provider lists.
- 04Track record: founding year and incidents the provider discloses itself.
- 05Fees: published commission, if any.
No project paid to be listed or ranked. Full rules: methodology.
What we did not test
- We did not open accounts, deposit money or place trades with these services.
- We did not audit smart contracts, reserves or security claims ourselves; we report what the project and its auditors publish.
- Fees, limits and availability change; the list date shows when we last checked them.
Rubric last updated Oct 1, 2026. Crypto assets are not insured by the FDIC or SIPC, and you can lose all the money you put in. This page is educational content, not financial advice.
How to choose
01Ask for the commission in writing
None of the five posts a flat fee on the pages we checked. P2P.org says it takes a commission from rewards; get the rate per network.
02Check the certification date
Ask any provider for its latest SOC 2 or ISO report, not just the badge.
03Read the incident notices
A provider that discloses incidents on its own site is easier to vet. Ask each one for its incident history.
Who should skip all of these
- Retail stakers looking for an app: use a liquid staking protocol or an exchange instead.
- Anyone who wants a guaranteed yield: rates shown are network reward rates and change.
Bottom line
Pick on networks and custody model first, then get the commission in writing: none of the five publishes it.
Figment and P2P.org cover the most networks; Everstake lists the most certifications.
Educational content, not financial advice. Crypto assets are volatile; do your own research.
FAQ
What is an institutional staking provider?
±
A company that runs validator nodes for funds, custodians and exchanges, so they earn staking rewards without running infrastructure themselves.
Do these providers take custody?
±
Figment says it never takes custody, and P2P.org describes itself as non-custodial.
What fees do staking providers charge?
±
A commission on rewards, not a flat fee. P2P.org lists 5% on native ETH staking and Chorus One lists 5% on Ethereum; the other providers here did not publish a rate on the pages we checked.
Which staking provider supports the most networks?
±
P2P.org states 40+ networks; Figment and Chorus One state 30+.
What commission do P2P.org and Chorus One charge?
±
Both take a share of rewards. P2P.org lists 5% on native ETH staking, 7% on DVT ETH staking and 7% on Solana. Chorus One's staking data, dated September 30, 2026, listed 5% on Ethereum, 5% or 8% on Solana depending on the validator, 7.5% on Cosmos and 20% on Celestia.
What changed in this list
2026-09-26First version: 6 institutional staking providers, facts from each provider's own site.
2026-09-26Moved Kiln to Not on this list: its terms list the United States as a prohibited country. List now ranks 5 providers.
2026-10-01Added a FAQ on P2P.org and Chorus One commission rates.
Who made this page
✓
Fact check
Checked against 9 sourcesLast check: Oct 1, 2026
A value we could not confirm on the project’s own pages is marked “Not verified” instead of estimated.
How we review